| 2002 Rice Outlook |
|
| Published on July 1, 2002 |
|
|
 |
Overview
Rice production is predicted to slow down
this year, whereas global consumption is on the rise. Thus
ending stocks of rice worldwide are expected to fall. Import
growth is forecast in countries whose production is subject
to the El Nino weather pattern and immediate import requirements.
Overall rice exports should fare well, but higher prices in
some countries may deter export growth. India is in limelight
this year thanks to its very competitive prices and plentiful
rice stocks.
While record US supplies and the current
downturn in global rice prices are forcing US prices down
to unprecedented levels, the Thai government is struggling
to shore up prices through price intervention programs, which
have so far proved successful. Limited export supplies from
Pakistan and Vietnam are keeping prices high currently, while
India is offering significantly lower prices thanks to its
export subsidies. However, world rice prices may fluctuate
in the future pending the arrival of new crops, the impacts
of weather conditions and changing demand from importers.
Production
According to the USDA, global 2001/2002 rice production is
forecast at 397 million tons (milled basis), nearly 700,000
tons lower than the previous year. The harvest season is well
advanced in countries in the southern hemisphere and around
the equatorial belt, many of which are already in the process
of reaping their main crop. Preliminary forecasts mostly point
to diminished production. For instance, heavy floods are estimated
to have caused a one million ton drop in production in Indonesia,
while drought might have impaired planting in Malaysia. In
Africa, low prices in the past season, insufficient rains
at planting time and localized flooding at the development
stage are likely to have resulted in a decline in output in
Madagascar.
2001/2002 rice production in selected countries (milled
basis)
| Country |
Volume (million
tons) |
| Burma |
10.44 |
| China |
126.00 |
| India |
90.00 |
| Indonesia |
32.42 |
| Pakistan |
3.74 |
| Thailand |
16.50 |
| Vietnam |
20.63 |
| US |
6.76 |
Source: USDA's rice production forecast
In South America, a negative outcome is
foreseen in Argentina, a reflection of poor producer prices
last year, Chile, Ecuador and Uruguay, where crops have suffered
from excessive precipitation. In contrast, output is officially
forecast to rise by over 10 percent in Brazil.
In Australia, the size of the crop could be down 32 percent,
with the decline attributed to reduced availability of irrigation
water, abnormally cool temperatures at the early stage of
crop development and weed infestation.
Early prospects for 2002 paddy production in the northern
hemisphere are clouded by a possible recurrence of the El
Nino phenomenon, which might distort the weather pattern during
the second half of the year. In the EU, a favorable 2002 paddy
season is anticipated. Based on farmers' declared planting
intentions, output in the United States is forecast to remain
close to the 2001 record.
A fall in production is currently predicted in India and China,
though less pronounced than in the previous two years. Moreover,
lingering drought problems are anticipated to severely constrain
plantings and output in Pakistan. Paddy production could also
recede somewhat in Thailand and the Philippines, while an
increase is foreseen in Bangladesh and Vietnam.
In Egypt, high producer prices in 2001 may induce an expansion
of rice cultivation this season, but much will depend on water
availability at the time of planting.
Overall, little change is anticipated in Central America and
the Caribbean, although a recovery is expected in Mexico,
Costa Rica and El Salvador.
As for ending stocks, global rice consumption in 2001/2002
is predicted to reach 407.7 million tons, up 1.7 million tons
from a year earlier and the largest figure to date, while
production is lower at 397 million tons. As consumption exceeds
production, ending stocks are expected to fall 8 percent to
126 million tons in 2001/2002. A reduction in ending stocks
is also likely to be experienced by Brazil, Egypt, Indonesia,
and Japan. On the other hand, the season is anticipated to
end with a larger rice carryover in Bangladesh, India, the
Republic of Korea and the United States. Overall, both importing
and exporting countries are likely to face a stock reduction
by the close of their 2001/2002 seasons.
Export
India is expected to regain its status as a major supplier
of the international rice market this year. According to a
recent USDA forecast, its exports are projected at 4.5 million
tons, much higher than 1.7 million tons last year. The potential
export growth can be attributed to the country's huge of stock
of as much as 30 millions tons, which puts pressure on the
government to subsidize sales abroad. Price-competitive rice
from India is currently displacing some traditional exporters.
Obvious examples of this are the loss to India of Pakistan's
traditional market in Africa and Vietnam's position as second
biggest rice exporter.
Pak rice prices are relatively higher due to the limited output
this crop year. Therefore, Pak rice exports this year is estimated
at 1.25 million tons, lower than last year's estimate of 2.2
million tons.
Vietnam's rice exports are expected to fall to 3 million tons
this year from 3.7 million tons last year. Reasons for the
export decline are currently uncompetitive price levels and
limited export supplies caused by expected lower output, strong
domestic demand in anticipation of drought-induced shortfalls
and speculative hoarding by farmers. In line with this, the
country has recently revised its export target to only 2.5
million tons from a previous target of 3.2 million tons.
Rice export volume in selected countries
| Country |
2001 (million tons) |
2002 (million tons) |
| Burma |
0.67 |
1.25 |
| China |
1.85 |
1.50 |
| India |
1.70 |
4.50 |
| Pakistan |
2.20 |
1.25 |
| Thailand |
7.52 |
7.25 |
| Vietnam |
3.70 |
3.00 |
| US |
2.63 |
2.80 |
Source: USDA's rice export forecast
Thailand is expected to export
7.25 million tons, marginally lower than last year's record
7.52 million. Over the past several months, overall overseas
demand for Thai rice has been rather weak, as elevated price
levels supported by ongoing intervention programs by the Thai
government have kept prices less competitive amidst tense competition
of cheaper rice from other sources like India.
US rice exports, on the contrary, are predicted to grow to 2.8
million tons in 2002, up from 2.6 million tons last year, mainly
to nearby markets in Central America. Also, a bumper crop this
marketing year, which amounts to as much as 6.76 million tons
(milled basis), the highest since 1997/1998, have weakened prices
to more competitive levels.
The anticipated expansion of the global market this year should
give scope for larger rice sales by Myanmar, whose 2002 rice
exports are projected at 1.25 million tons, up from 0.67 million
tons a year earlier. After rice export suspension in 1988 to
ensure national food security, Myanmar has since 2000 eagerly
geared up for rice exports to increase national income. In contrast,
short supplies might result in a drop in deliveries by Australia,
and Uruguay.
Imports
According to the USDA, the world rice import forecast for 2002
stands at 24.6 million tons (milled basis), down from 24.83
million tons last year. Among major importers, import increases
are forecast for Indonesia (3 million tons from 1.5 million
last year), Iran (1.25 million tons from 0.74 million tons)
and Saudi Arabia (1 million tons from 1.05 million tons). Indonesia's
increase could be attributed to domestic shortfalls caused by
unfavorable conditions for planting, while the other two countries,
which rely solely on foreign rice imports, have registered consistent
increases over the past few years. Rice flows into Central America
and the Caribbean are anticipated to expand somewhat to compensate
for the production shortfall last year.
Rice import volume in selected countries
| Country |
2001 (million tons) |
2002 (million tons) |
| China |
0.27 |
0.31 |
| Indonesia |
1.50 |
3.00 |
| Iran |
0.74 |
1.25 |
| Iraq |
0.96 |
1.00 |
| Nigeria |
1.74 |
1.50 |
| Philippines |
1.18 |
0.65 |
| Saudi Arabia |
1.05 |
1.00 |
| Senegal |
0.86 |
0.85 |
| US |
0.41 |
0.40 |
Source: USDA's rice import forecast
On the other hand, import decreases are expected for Nigeria
(1.5 million tons from 1.74 million last year). The decline
could be attributed to the raise in import duties to 150 percent
in April, twice as high as in 2001. Imports by other African
countries, a major force in sustaining international trade last
year, are also expected to be lower, especially in the major
markets, i.e. Cote d'Ivoire (0.57 million tons from 0.65 million
last year), and Senegal (0.85 million tons from 0.86 million)
Likewise, most of the other traditional rice importers in Asia
are expected to reduce imports, including Bangladesh (0.4 million
tons from 0.402 million last year) and the Philippines (0.65
million tons, the lowest since 1998, from 1.18 million), both
of which gathered excellent crops in 2001. During the past few
years, the Philippines' rice imports have consistently slowed
down owing to substantial domestic output.
Prices
In spite of the long-term decline in global rice prices, prices
have remained relatively steady so far this year. Much of this
reflects the program of intervention purchases in Thailand,
where the Government appears determined not to let prices fall
the way they did a year ago. Additionally, due to the present
appreciation of the baht, Thai prices have risen about US$ 5
per ton since early May despite currently low overseas demand.
Since January, weekly prices have ranged from $192-212 per ton,
higher than during the comparable period last year. However,
Thai parboiled rice prices have weakened since last October
given tougher competition from cheaper parboiled rice from India.
The overall price strength in Thailand contrasts with a continued
weakness in US prices following bumper crops this year. As a
result, the price difference between Thai and US high quality
long grain rice shrank to $2 per ton in April 2002, compared
with $101 per ton one year earlier. Usually, US rice trades
at a higher price than Thai rice for comparable grades. US prices
have hit historical lows in many decades, but US rice has become
more competitive in the world market and sales have reportedly
grown based on export pace to date.
Meanwhile,
sale prices were steady to strong in Pakistan, both for Basmati
and IRRI rice, due to lower output caused by irrigation water
shortage and strong domestic demand. High Pak rice prices are
responsible for weak export performance this year. Similarly,
quotations in Vietnam, which had softened in March when supplies
from the winter/spring crop reached the market, showed a general
tendency to recover in April and have continued rising. Vietnam
prices have been up about $10 per ton over the past few months.
The strong price increase can be attributed to currently low
export supplies, as a lot of rice is needed domestically in
anticipation of drought-induced shortfalls and speculative hoarding
by farmers has been reported to be considerable so far. Also,
lower harvests of some crops may put pressure on price levels.
At present, Vietnam rice is trading at just a few dollars below
Thai prices, whereas Vietnam prices are usually $30-40 lower.
However, a lack of new sales and the entry of the summer/autumn
crop are likely to lower prices later on this year.
Source: FAO
By contrast, most Indian rice prices have weakened compared
with the levels prevailing earlier this year because of significant
subsidies by the government and enormous stockpiles. As a result,
rice from Indian origin remained the most competitive on the
market.
Although the prospects for international rice prices in the
coming months have brightened following the announcement of
a surge in imports by Indonesia, there is still considerable
uncertainty regarding purchases by China. The price outlook
is also dimmed by the growing presence of India as a cheap rice
supplier to the world market. However, of even more fundamental
importance will be the development of the harvest in the Northern
Hemisphere in the coming months.
|